
Who's betting on Oscars 2027: Best Production Design Nominations?
Smart money backs The Further Mis-Adventures of Cliff Booth: 65% of the money on Yes is in the hands of wallets in profit overall, 53 points ahead of No.
- Markets
- 2 2 still open
- Traded
- $28K across the event
- Favourite
- 44% The Further Mis-Adventures of Cliff Booth
- Smart money pick
- 65% The Further Mis-Adventures of Cliff Booth
What the money says
The odds
Sense and Sensibility Yes 7% · The Further Mis-Adventures of Cliff Booth Yes 44%.
The smart money
Sense and Sensibility: smart money on No · The Further Mis-Adventures of Cliff Booth: smart money on Yes.
Every market in this event
the odds and where the profitable wallets sit on eachFollow the smart money on Oscars 2027: Best Production Design Nominations, as it happens.
Questions
Who is betting on Oscars 2027: Best Production Design Nominations?
Polkyo scores every holder of the 2 markets in this event by their track record. The biggest: Sense and Sensibility Yes 7%, smart money on No; The Further Mis-Adventures of Cliff Booth Yes 44%, smart money on Yes.
What are the Polymarket odds for Oscars 2027: Best Production Design Nominations?
The biggest: Sense and Sensibility Yes 7%, smart money on No; The Further Mis-Adventures of Cliff Booth Yes 44%, smart money on Yes.
What is smart money share?
The part of a side's money held by wallets that are in profit overall, each scored by its record as of the day it entered the market.
Smart money share: the part of a side's money held by wallets in profit overall, each scored by its record as of the day it entered. How Polkyo works. Analytics from public data, not financial advice. Not affiliated with Polymarket.